The Effectiveness Of Technology

The Effectiveness Of engineeringOver the years, applied science has played a full of life role in piece of workal innovation, providing two t all(prenominal)ers and scholars with more(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) options and flexibility in their instruct and companionship practices. With the internet and computer engineering avail force, applied science becomes increasingly indispens fitted in the area of pedagogy. In to day sequences schools, mul sequencedia softw ar, content found CD-ROMs, online resources and galore(postnominal) separate technologies provide bookmans and teachers with more recent re explore tools, limitless wealth of nurture, shargond professional practices, communication tools, and new modes of schooling (keane, 2002) in (Eunjoo Russell, 2002). Availability of internet in schools enables some(prenominal) the teachers and students to feel a categorization of opportunities to expand the curriculum.Todays school continue to be ch a loneenged by the increased visibility, roles and court of instructional applied science tools. Considering current trends in education, a modernistic schoolroom would non be complete with aside computers, softwargon, internet connections, projectors and a variety of other high-tech device (Keane, 2002). harmonize to Hasselbring, Barron Risko, (2000), schools leave alone be equipped with the stovepipe hardware and software in the near future, but it is strangely that teachers and students pull up stakes engross them op successiontionively if teachers are non trained. The success of engineering excerption in schools depends on training teachers. In the digital age, schools give quest teachers to construct commensurate engineering science skills and be able to coreively put through the procedure of instructional engineering in schoolrooms. therefore, it is logical to require teachers to be trained to handle such technologically equipped schoolrooms. applied science incorporate in the classroom has become an measurable aspect of booming teach. It has triggered some(prenominal) searchers to investigate assorted aspects of such integrating (e.g., Kotrlik Redmann, 2005 Bauer Kenton, 2005 Judson, 2006 Zhao, 2007 Gulbahar, 2007 Anderson Maninger, 2007 Abbit Klett, 2007 and Wood Ashfield, 2008). This is beca rehearse it allows students to learn more in less time and allows schools to focus on world(prenominal) learn environss if employ appropriately. It could overly be an effective learn tool when delectationd to engage all students in the learning plow. During the furthest few years, engineering science has been adopted in many areas such as business, entertainment, government and education. The globose bankers acceptance of technology has been the landmark on the educational scene for the last few years (Albirini, 2006). Harvey (1983) envisages that the effectiveness of the wasting disease of computers in educat ion may be an important factor in determining which countries will obey in the future.In recent years, educational technology has been to a turgid extent incorporated into didactics and learning practice in many educational institutions across the globe. This phenomenon has taken place as a rejoinder to economic, social and pedagogical pressures (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2001). From the economic rationale, it is believed that acquaintance and competence in technology will produce graduates hazard to be professionally diligent (Thornburg, 2002). Indeed, it is argued that the measured aim of employability will strengthen the economy of a earth (Mutula Bakel, 2007). The social rationale sees competence in the persona of technology as a necessary skill for graduate to participate in familiarity development (OECD, 2001). This fag end aid students to lead the society to meet the challenges of the global information. As regarding the pedagogic al rationale, the consolidation of technology in education claimed to help oneself a transformation of teaching and learning swear out from being passing teacher centered to student centered (Tru great dealo, 2005). The student-centered environment is argued to be more favourable than the teacher-centered environment because it divulges learners the opportunity to actively participate in k nowledge construction (Roblyer, Edward Havriluv, 2004).Teachers are managers of learning set out. As managers, they are meant to ensure that the environment is structured in a way that learners are given the opportunity to engage in a deep and meaningful learning process. A way through which this role can be accomplished is for teachers to yield the responsibility of an educational technologist, i.e., a professional who embarks on the sketch of theories and practices associated with the use of technology in instruction. According to Seels (2004), in Westergaad (2008), in that respect ar e universal roles that educational technologists must take. First is the regulation and reinforcement of selected media to promote learning, present moment is to educate teachers and stake holders nearly the use of media and the third is critique and third house policies that influence media utilization. Among the three roles, the first is expected from teachers in the classroom. The fact that a lot of factors are responsible for students underachievement is non new to exploreers but amongst those factors could be teachers acquaintance of the effectiveness of technology.Perception refers the way one think round something and ones idea of what it is like, also it is an ability to understand the true nature of a subject especially as it affects our environment. However teachers perception of the effectiveness of technology is in different ways hence, learning is a process which produces series of changes in behaviour or it is more or less a change in behaviour that result from activities, training or observation. It is a change in behaviour that confirms learning.Technology has had a probatory regard on teaching and learning in schools (Cuttance, 2001). Reviews of several research projects bear substantiated the potential of educational technology to prove learning environments (Sivin-Kachala Bialo, 1994) and improve student learning outcomes (Hativa Becker, 1994) through active student engagement, collaborative learning, frequent and quick feedback and real-world contexts for learning (Roschelle, Pea, Hoadley, Gordin Means, 2000). In addition, ICT kick upstairss higher order thinking (Educational Testing Service, 1989), and impacts on student attitudes, motivation, self esteem, social competencies and enjoyment of learning (Joiner, 1996 Rowe, 1993 Tiernay, 1996 Wellburn, 1996). However, the extent to which ICT facilitates and enhance teaching, learning and the learning environment is dependent in part on the adequacy of teachers skills and know ledge (Wenglinsky, 1998).Technology integrating into teaching and learning process is an effective way to widen educational opportunities, but this is yet to be fully utilized by teachers as an instructional delivery system. Bauer Kenton (2005) in their research found that some teachers were highly educated and skilled with apply technology, but are not integrating technology on a consistent basis in the teaching and learning process. Ertmer, Conklin, Lewandowski, Osika, Selo, and Wignall (2003) indicated that beginning teachers wanted to use technology and have adequate technical skills, but teachers loseed knowledge on how to commingle technology in teaching and learning. Technology desegregation is not a one size fits all (Wepner, Tao, Ziomek, 2006) where teachers do the similar thing for their students or where teachers possess the same specific skills to be competent technology users. Teachers involve to know how and why to use technology in meaningful ways in the lea rning process for technology desegregation to work.Like many educational reform efforts, the introduction of technology in schools has been less than successful. Over the last century there were several waves of long investment in technology to improve education, but none has had significant lasting impact on education (Cuban, 1986). Implementation of technology is a complex process that depends on characteristics of technology, workers, environment, and subtle interactions among these components (Bayer and Melone 1989 Yetton, Sharma Southon 1999 Wolfe, 1994).Questions have been asked in studies about many failed educational innovations. In Fullan (1991) a question was raised that wherefore technology isnt used more in schools? Also in Tyack Cuban (1995) a question was also raised that Why cant innovations that have the appearance _or_ semblance to hold great promises be adopted by schools in arouse of great efforts? Many researchers have been searching for solutions to this persistent puzzle. In this subject, the search continues by the examination of teachers perception of the effectiveness of technology in enhancing teaching and learning. nevertheless it is not intend to simply repeat previous research but to search for new factors that may affect technology uses in schools because it is believed that previous research have set about, if not all, factors that may have an effect on technology desegregation in schools. What is makeed is an integrating framework that can provide new directions for research and specific suggestions for constitution and practice. Thus it is taken as a responsibility to extend exist research by investigating the relationships among the long list of factors that have already been place to be related to school technology uses. In particular, teachers perception of the effectiveness of technology to theoretically conflate and organize sets of factors that affect writ of execution of technology. It is also hoped tha t this framework will help in better thought of other educational innovations, since technology, is a special case of innovation. education of difficultyDue to the role of technology in the advancement of society in general and educational sector in particular, effective technology integration into teaching and learning has become the focus of many educators. Over the years, the paradox of under achievement has been a general problem. For example, many researchers in Nigeria which allow Adeyemi (2005), Balduf (2009), Chukwu (2009), Patric (2010), Obomanu (2011) and Anakwe (2011) have conducted series of research to investigate what could be responsible for the problem. In their studies, factors such as escape of adequate laboratory equipment, ineffectiveness and lack of teaching proficiency of teachers, lack of qualified teachers and school factors have been identified as major causes of underachievement of students. Despite all these efforts of research and findings, the poor performances of students still exist. However, little emphasis has been laid on the integration of instructional technology into teaching.Disproportionately very few schools and teachers adopt the use of instructional technology in classroom teaching in Lagos state. As indicated by Byers (2000), wield (2002), and also Kahveci (2011) the perception of the effectiveness of instructional technology by teachers may play a role in the adoption and integration of these technologies. This henceforward unspoiltifies the need for this call for to investigate the effect of teachers perception of their technology integration competencies, barriers obstructing such integration, and incentives to increase it, in addition to other related issues in classroom learning environment.Purpose of the StudyThe purpose of this learning is to analyse teachers perception of the effectiveness of technology and the rate at which they adopt technology into classroom teaching.Research QuestionThe next q uestions will guide this domainHow do teachers perceptions of the effectiveness of technology affect the rate at which they mix it in their teaching process?Does the demographic characteristic of teachers such as gender, age, years of teaching fix, grade take aim taught, content area, and educational level affect the rate at which they integrate instructional technology?Statement of HypothesisThere will be no significant effect of teachers perception of the effectiveness of technology on the rate at which they integrate it in their teaching process.Significance of StudyMode of teaching and instructional tools employed in the teaching process is of a major richness in determining the achievement of students. This poll will create in the students, teachers and curriculum builders the awareness of technology, its integration, effect and benefits. These will also help the teachers in knowing there level of technological competency and also factors that great power be militating a gainst the integration of these technologies in teaching. It will also highlight the need for teachers to combat deficit thinking. Because only by this will teachers develop coercive attitude towards instructional technology utilization in teaching process. This study will also clarify to the teachers the need to use technology as a catalyst for change and improvement in the practice of teaching. Further, it will clarify to the teachers the need to integrate technology into teaching so as to facilitate the constructivist system of teaching which can be used to enhance student learning of specific subject matter.For the school administrators and curriculum builders this study will assist in their planning by suggesting specific strategies and procedures that can make technology integration easy and achievable. It will also give empirical gage for a need to upgrade and increase the level of instructional technology integration in the classroom in a manner that will enhances student learning. It will also show them the need to orientate teachers on the need for technology integration in their teaching practices.If the findings of this study are adequately applied, the learning facilities operational to the students will be enriched in technology by school administrators and this will in wrestle enhance the students performance and better their achievement.Scope of Study and DelimitationThis is a study into the effect of teachers perception of the effectiveness of instructional technology integration in enhancing teaching in selected ordinal institution in Lagos state.CHAPTER 2REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATUREIn this literature, teachers perception of technology integration and factors affecting their level of technology integration will be discussed. This chapter accordingly reviews related literature based on the purpose of the study. The literature of this study is derived from researches from 1999 to 2012.Outline of Literature ReviewIntroductionDifference be tween Technology consolidation and Technology UseImpact of Technology desegregation on Teachers and studentsFactors Affecting Teachers Level of Technology IntegrationTeachers Perceptions of Technology Integration and sexual urge DifferencesBarriers Technology Integration2.1 IntroductionThe use of technology in education has emerged to become an increasingly indispensible part of higher and professional education (Almekhlafi, 2006a). Technology, in addition to giving learners the opportunity to control their own learning process, also makes available for them ready access to a large amount of information over which the teacher has no control (Lam Lawrence, 2002).Literacy is defined as the ability to read and write, but currently, the definition of literacy has gone beyond this. A new type of literacy is developing as our society makes new technological developments. Teachers are now set about in addition to their preparing students to read and write with the depute of educating students to be technologically literate. Definition of literacy according to Mullen and Wedwick (2008) in Catherine (2011) is no long-dated the traditional definition which is being able to read and write, the definition is now expanding to computer and technology literacy. The literate of the twenty-first century must be able to download, upload, rip, burn, chat, save, blog, Skype, IM, and share. The main goal of literacy, no matter what type, is to be able to communicate effectively. Digital literacy, computer literacy or technological literacy all enhance a persons ability to communicate by adding another dimension to the arsenal of skills a literate person already possesses (Jones-Kavalier Flannigan, 2008) in (Catherine, 2011).The each day souring complexity of education, the rise of the information to learn, the need for qualified and modern education require the use of computers as a tool in education. The use of technology in education will provide that the education will be carried out in accordance with the needs of the era as well(p) as that the highest appropriate yield will be received from education (Kayri, Genoglu and Kayri , 2012). The computer which is one of the technological capabilities and a fundamental element of culture in our century, has become a tool which its use is rapidly spreading (Arslan, 2003 Odabasi, 2006) in (Kayri, Genoglu and Kayri, 2012).2.2 Difference between Technology Integration and Technology UseWhen use technology in the classroom, it is important to come apart between technology use and technology integration. Technology use is just the use of technology it means much more to integrate technology (Catherine, 2011). The contrast between technology use and technology integration for learning is that integration implies full-time, daily operation within lessons. Integration involves daily use of technology in reforming the everyday classroom routines (Gorder, 2008). Technology integration is not about the availa bility of technology, but more about the teachers effective use of technology that makes a inequality in reforming the classroom. The teacher is the nearly important ingredient for success when using and integrating technology (Mandell, Sorge, Russell, 2002). Beckett, Wetzel, Chishlom, Zambo, Buss, Padgett, Williams and Odom (2003) in Gorder, (2008) verbalise teachers are central to the creation of a technology-integrated environment that is learner-centered and motivating. Therefore, without teachers who can integrate technology, students exposure to technology remains limited and inequitable.Ozel, Yetkiner and Capraro (2008) in (Catherin, 2011) claim that there are five phases for properly integrating technology. These five phases employ the following questions Why should I use a technology-based method? How will I know students have learned? What teaching strategies and activities will work best? Are adequate hardware, software and technical support available? What worked wel l and what could be improved? By examining each of these questions, a teacher is not just using technology, the teacher is thoughtfully planning how technology can be used in the lesson in order to best equip the needs of the students which is integration.2.3 Impact of Technology Integration on Teachers and studentsTechnology is kindly to teachers because it addresses the need of learners with visual styles as well as of learners with special needs. Moreover, technology exposes learners to a world of information. It has also enabled some teachers to implement new teaching techniques learned through computer (U.S congress of Technology Assessment, 1995) in (Almekhafi, 2004). There are numerous researchers who have explored the area of technology integration oecumenic and have came up with reports indicating its confirmatory impact on teaching and learning for teachers using technology. These studies involve Guha, 2000 Manzo, 2001 Shelly, Bilig, Jesse Acosta (2001) Zorfass and R ivero, 2005 Almekhlafi, 2006.Guha (2000) conducted a study to investigate the personal experience of elementary school teachers using computers in the classroom. He investigated their present use of computers in the classroom, and their views on current computer use as compared to their favourite(a) use in classroom instruction. He came up with findings which reported positive correlations and significant differences between the previous training, computer practice in the classroom and comfort level of teachers and their present computer training, level of comfort, and computer usage in the classroom.Manzo (2001) also carried out a study on technology integration in an Art class. He found out that nearly of the students, who are enrolled in the Electronic Arts Class prior to enrolment, were not able to compete effectively in most of their other classes. But after experiencing the effect of technology utilization, they began to appreciate the importance of doing well in all subje cts. Also, Shelly et al. (2001) in their study examine a project name the WEB Project. The findings of their survey suggest that teachers should as they integrate technology into different areas in the academic content, emphasize the use of meta-cognitive skills, application of skills, and inquiry of learning.Almekhlafi, A.G. (2006a) in his study investigated the effect of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on elementary-prep school students improvement in English as a extraneous language (EFL). Results from the study show evidence of the effect of CALL on learning English as a foreign language. It was discovered that a positive attitude was experienced toward CALL, it was also perceived its utility for parcel them learn EFL, and the students had a strong intention to use it in the future.The literatures, both in theory and practice, supports the idea that students learning in a companionship of learners environment using technology as a tool for learning, are able to bui ld on prior knowledge, feel success and grow to their fullest potential. It seems evident that a constructivist-learning environment allows students to experience success with the integration of technology. However, researchers charge us to recognize that technology alone cannot bring about all the needed changes in todays classrooms.2.4 Factors Affecting Teachers Level of Technology Integration legion(predicate) studies have been carried out as a result of the attention of many researchers drawn to the integration of technology at schools and factors influencing such integration. In a study on teachers who used computer technology in their instruction conducted by Bauer Kenton (2005), to investigate how much they used technology, the obstacles they had to overcome to succeed in its use, and their general issues and concerns regarding technology. It was observed that the teachers were who are highly educated and skilled with technology, were mod and adept at overcoming obstacles, but that they did not integrate technology on a consistent basis as both a teaching and learning tool. Two key issues that were noted are their students did not have enough time at computers, and that teachers needed extra planning time for technology lessons. Other concerns were outdated hardware, lack of appropriate software, technical difficulties, and student skill levels.Kotrlik Redmann (2005) examined the extent of technology integration in instruction by adult basic education teachers. The teachers used for this study are in the early stage of technology integration thereby more active in the area of exploration. The findings from the study reveals that that teachers feel some disquiet when it comes to technology integration, they perceived that they are effective in using technology careless(predicate) of whether they have integrated technology, and they are encountering barriers. As teachers perceive an increase in barriers, their integration of technology decreases als o, as the availability and increase of ICT tools, such as computers with Internet connection in the classroom and/or lab increases their level of technology integration.In a study conducted by Gulbahar (2007), investigating both student and teachers perception to illustrate how technology planning process was carried out in a private school in Turkey. Findings from the study indicated that redden teachers and administrator staff felt themselves competent in using ICT available at the school still, they reported a lack of guidelines that would lead them to successful integration. On the other hand, students reported that ICT is not utilized sufficiently in their classes.Zhao (2007) conducted a qualitative research to investigate the perspectives and experiences of teachers following technology integration training. The findings of his study indicated that teachers view towards technology integration is diverse, and this has an influence on their use of technology in the classroom. I t further reveals that willingness to use technology and positive experiences were related to teachers increased use of technology and to more creative use of technology, because most teachers who are willing to use technology, expressed positive experiences with technology integration training, increased their use of technology in the classroom, and used technology more creatively. But this did not ensure that teachers would replace their teaching with technology.2.5 Teachers Perceptions of Technology Integration and Gender DifferencesThe perspective of teachers of their understanding of technology, their utilization of instructional technology, and feelings about the support structure associated with this equipment have been examined with the findings suggesting that teachers believe technology is an integral part of the process of educating their students Almekhlafi Almeqdadi 2010. There are different literatures relating to gender differences in the technology integration. Of t hese studies include Hong Koh, 2002 Kian Chee, 2002 cream puff Xu, 2007 Aremu Fasan, 2011 Hon Alison, 2012).Gender discrepancy was studied in both classroom access and use by Hong and Koh (2002), it was found that male teachers were less vile when compared with the female teachers toward hardware. They also found that there is no significant difference in the overall level of computer anxiety of male teachers was not significantly different from the anxiety levels of female teachers. Only for the hardware anxiety domain was significant differences detected between male and female teachers.Zhou Xu (2007) conducted a study which was aimed at exploring how gender affects the process of technology adoption in post-secondary teaching. Findings from this study suggest that females had lower confidence and less experience in the use of computers in teaching. Also, they tended to learn how to use technology from others, unlike the males who were more likely to learn from their own e xperience. Also, in a study by Aremu Fasan (2011) which was aimed at investigating factors that could affect technology use and by teachers analysis from the study showed that the computer self efficacy was average for most of the teachers though female teachers have higher Computer self efficacy than male teachers.Hon Alison (2012) conducted a study which was used to examining the effect of gender difference regarding confidence toward using technology for learning in higher educational institutions. The findings of this study confirmed that male have more confidence in using technology for learning than do females because gender imbalances in work out are socially constructed and not related to a learners innate ability.2.6 Barriers Technology IntegrationThere are numerous researches that have documented a number of barriers which hinder the integration of technology. Out of these include Earle, 2002 Flores, 2002, Brinkerhof, 2006 and Almekhlafi Almeqdadi, 2010. In the study by Robert Ferries (1994) cited by Almekhlafi Almeqdadi, (2010), it was stated that barriers to technology integration included lack of knowledge of the available technological resources, time commitment, the risk associated with the use of technology and also the view of technology as an ever changing thing. According to Earle (2002), in her study, she classified the factors that affect technology integration in the classroom into two. These are alien and intrinsic. These factors are defined as restraining force to the teachers. The extrinsic factors are identified as access, available resources, support, time, and training of teachers while the restraining factors that are intrinsic are identified as teachers attitudes, beliefs, practices, and resistance.In the study of Flores (2002), it was identified that in the attempt of teachers to integrate technology in their teaching activity, they were faced by many obstacle. In addition to administrative support and time scheduling for the use of technology, equity is another important issue. The introduction of technology is particularly hard when there are few resources. This is supported by Almekhlafi Almeqdadi, (2010) where he cited Brinkerhof (2006) who grouped the restraining into four (4) main categories administrative and institutional resources and support, attitudinal or personality factors, and experience and training.CHAPTER THREERESEARCH METHODOLOGYIntroductionThis chapter highlights how the field work will be carried out. It describes the design, nature of population, sample, instruments used and how the instrument will be administered as well as analyzed.Research DesignThis study is a descriptive study which will be conducted to investigate the effect of teachers perception of instructional technology and the level at which they integrate these technologies in the process of teaching and learning.Area of StudyThe study was carried out in Lagos state.Population of StudyThe population for this study will consists of all lecturers in the tertiary institution in Lagos state with special reference to the lecturers of selected tertiary institutions in Lagos state.Sample and Sampling TechniqueThe tertiary institution in comprises of Colleges of Education, Poly-techniques, and Universities. In Lagos state, there are ____ Colleges of Education, ____ Poly Techniques, and ____ Universities out of which one will be ergodicly selected from each as a representative sample. In each of the selected schools, 60 lecturers will be selected using a purposeful random selection The sample of this study will be lecturers who will be selected using a purposefully random sampling technique. This will be the sample the questionnaire will be administered to.InstrumentationThe instrument that will be used in this study is The Mills Tincher Technology Integration Standards phase Matrix (TISCM). This is a model for determining technology integration by teachers (Mills Tincher, 2003). This instrument will consist of two sections as followsSection A Demographic dataSection B 18 Survey questions constitution of InstrumentThe instruments will be critically examined, scrutinized and amended by my executive program and experts who are experienced in area of research to ensure the hardiness its of.selective information CollectionTo answer the research questions in this study, a research tool (Technology Integration Standards Configuration Matrix (TISCM)) which was developed by Dr. Steven Mills, will be used to investigate teachers perception of technology and how they integrated technology on a daily basis. This tool will consist of a number of subthemes that will investigated teachers perceptions of their technology competencies and usage, determined how teachers integrate and use technology.Data AnalysisData gathered from questionnaire items will be analyzed using SPSS 17.0. Descriptive statistics, a multivariate analysis, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be used. In addition , items will be analysed using Item Analysis method in order to get a deep understanding of the results from the questionnaire.